Wacana Kritis Studi Ilmu Sosial, Hukum, dan Kedaulatan

Muliono Muliono

Abstract


This paper offers a new course in understanding of law and society, including in understanding of Islamic law studies. The main objective is for emancipatory movement encouraging legal understanding, legal consciousness, and development in democratic, civilized and prosperous course. This study uses a critical discourse approach that develops in the post-positivism tradition. In principle, this study uses qualitative. By criticizing positivism domination, the idea of critical discourse on social sciences, law, and sovereignty requires a praxis’ notion in everyday life that can be seen in the presence of sovereignty that guaranteed and protected human rights, equality, freedom, and walfare. Therefore, the need of paradigm shift in the study of law and society is the heart of this study. Law is formed for human, humanize the human, and therefore should have the liberation movement.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Acemoglu, D. & Wolitzky, A. 2018. A Theory of Equality Before The Law. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper, 1-50.

Affandi, H. I. 2004. Akar Konflik Sepanjang Zaman- Hakimul Ikhwan Affandi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Agger, B. 2009. Teori Sosial: Kritik, Penerapan dan Implikasinya. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana

Alonso, F. H. L. 2012. Cicero and Natural Law. Philosophy of Law & Social Philosophy, 98(2), 157-168.

Astore, R. A. 2016. Defining the Legitimacy and Power of the State Through Weber and Foucault. Inquiries Journal, 8(5), 1-2. Diakses Desember dari http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1410/2/defining-the-legitimacy-and-power-of-the-state-through-weber-and-foucault.

Azra, A. 2016. Transformasi Politik Islam Radikalisme, Khilafatisme, dan Demokrasi. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group

Azwar, W. & Muliono. 2020. Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan: Cara Mudah Memahami Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Prenadamedia.

Azwar, W. & Muliono. 2020. Sosiologi Dakwah. Jakarta: Prenadamedia

Banakar, R. & Travers, M. 2005. Law, Sociology and Method dalam Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research. Onati: Hart Publishing Oxford and Portland Oregon.

Bank Dunia. 2015. The Millennium Development Goals Report.

Bauman, Z. 2005. Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press

Berger, P. L. & Luckman T. 2013. Tafsir Sosial Atas Kenyataan. Jakarta: LP3S.

Carothers, T. 2006. “The Rule-of-Law Revival” dalam Carothers, T (ed). Promoting Rule of Law Abroad: In Search of Knowledge. Washington: Carnegie Endowment For International Peace.

Cohen, J.L & Arato, A. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

National Kompas. 2020. Stunting di Indonesia Lebih Tinggi dari Ambang Batas WHO. Diakses Desember https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/11/19/17020401/terawan-angka-stunting-di-indonesia-lebih-tinggi-dari-ambang-batas-who.

Dreher, J., & Santos, H. 2017. Sociology and Phenomenology. Civitas, Porto Alegre, 17(3), 385-388.

Denzim, N.K & Lincoln, Y.S. 2009. Handbook Qualitative Research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Foucault, M. 2004. The Archeology of Knowladge. Francis: Routledge.

Franz & Beckmann, K. vB. 2006. The Dynamics of Change and Continuity in Plural Legal Orders. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 53(54), 1-44.

Fromm, E. (2008). Akar Kekerasan: Analisis Sosio-Psikologis atas Watak Manusia. Pustaka Pelajar

Gower, B. 2002. Scientific Method: an Historical and Philosophical Introduction. Londons: Routledge, Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Hardiman, B.F. 2015. Seni Memahami: Hermenutik Schleiermacher Sampai Derrida.. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Hermann, D. H. J. 1983. Max Weber and the Concept of Legitimacy in Contemporary Jurisprudence. DePaul Law Review, 33(1), 1-29.

Hiariej, E. 2003. Teori Negara Marxis. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 7(2), 261-282.

Ihromi, T.O. 1993. Antropologi Hukum: Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Irianto. S. 2012. Memperkenalkan kajian Sosio-legal dan implikasi Metodologisnya dalam Bedner, A. Kajian Sosio-Legal. Bali: Pustaka Larasan

Infid. International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development. 2018.

Jagland, T. 2018. State of Democracy, Human Rights And The Rule of Law: Role of institutions Threats to institutions. France: Council of Europe Publications.

Jhonson, D. P. 1986. Teori Sosiologi klasik dan Modern. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Khozin A, A. 2012. Konsep Kekuasan Michel Foucault. Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf & Pemikiran Islam, 2(1), 131-149.

Koentjaraningrat. 2016. Pengantar Ilmu Sosiologi. JakartaL Rineka Cipta

Kompas.com. (2020). Refleksi Pemilu 2019, Sebanyak 894 Petugas KPPS Meninggal Dunia.

Lebow, R. N. 2017. Max Weber and International Relations. United Kingdom. Cambridge University press.

Lessnoff, M. 1990. Social Contract Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

Maliki, Z. (2016). Sosiologi Politik: Makna Kekuasaan dan Transformasi Politik. Yogyakarta: UGM Press

Mannheim, J. 1991. Ideologi dan Utopia. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Masroer, C JB & Darmawan, L. 2016. Wacana Civil Society (Masyarkat Madani) di Indonesia. Sosiologi Reflektif, 10(2), 35-64.

McCarthy, T. 2018. Teori Kritis Jurgen Habermas. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana

Merriam, Jr, C. E. 1990. History of the Theory of Sovereignty Since Rousseau. Columbia: Batoche Books.

Moleong, L. J. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muliono. 2020. Pola Perubahan, Wacana, dan Tren Konflik Sosial di Indonesia. Journal of Religious Studies.

Nagan, W. P., & Haddad, A. M. 2012. Sovereignty in Theory and Practice. San Diego Int'l L.J, 13, 429- 549.

Otto, Jan Michiel (2007), Some Introductory Remarks on Law, Governance and Development, Leiden: Van Vollenhoven Institute, Faculty of Law, Leiden University

Plamenatz, J. 1992. Man and Society: Political and Social Theories from Machiavelli to Marx from the Middle Ages to Locke: From the Middle Ages to Locke. London: Longman.

Popper, Karl. 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Rahardjo, S. 2010. Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Ravena, D. 2010. Wacana Konsep Hukum Progresif dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Wawasan Hukum, 23(2), 155-166.

Ritzer, G. 2013. Sosiologi Berparadigma Ganda. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.

Ritzer, G & Goodman, D.J. 2018. Teori Sosiologi: Dari Teori Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Mutakhir Teori Sosial Posmodern. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Scharf, B. R. 1995. Kajian Sosiologi Agama. ter. Machnun Husein. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Sen, A. 2016. Kekerasan dan Identitas. Marjin Kiri.

Smith, D. N. 1998. Faith, Reason and Charisma: Rudolf Sohm, Max Weber, and the Theology of Grace. Sociological Inquiry, 68, 32-60.

Soekanto, S. 2002. Kesadaran hukum dan kepatuhan hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sun, J., & Wen, B. 2018. Study on the Popper's Scientific Demarcation Criterion. Atlantis Press, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 205, 923-926.

Supraja, M. 2012. Alfred Schutz: Rekonstruksi Teori Tindakan Max Weber. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 1(2), 81-90.

Suriasumantri, J. 2017. Filsafat ilmu pengetahuan sebuah pengantar populer. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan.

Suseno, M. 1992. Filsafat Sebagai Ilmu Kritis, Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2020. Sovereignty. Britannica: Encyclopædia Britannica. Diakses December dari https://www.britannica.com/topic/sovereignty.

Todaro, M. P. & Smith, S. C. 2010. Pembangunan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Erlangga.

United Nation Human Right. Inter-Parliamentary Union and the United Nations: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016.

Wallace, W.L. 1994. Metode Logika Ilmu Sosial. Jakarta: Radar Jaya Offset.

Widyastuti, A. R. 2015. Protection Against Women from the Perspective of Working of Law in Society. The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies, 3(4), 199-205.

Wignjosoebroto, S. 2002. Hukum: Paradigma, Metode dan Dinamika Masalahnya. Jakarta: ELSAM.

YLBHI. (2020). Reformasi Dikorupsi Oligarki. Laporan Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Tahun 2019.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 IJTIHAD



Flag Counter 

Ijtihad Visitor 

Creative Commons License
Ijtihad by Fakultas Syari'ah UIN Imam Bonjol Padang is licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)