PARTICIPATION IN MURDER: HOW DID IMAM MALIK AND IMAM AL-SHAFI'I DECIDE ON PUNISHMENT?

Irsyad Fikri

Abstract


This article aims to explain the cause of the difference of opinion between Imam Malik and Imam al-Shafi'i about the punishment for the perpetrator of participating in the act of murder. The research method used is qualitative research with a tarjih analysis approach, which describes how the legal status of istibdal waqf by comparing two scholarly opinions, namely Imam Ibn Taimiyah and Imam an-Nawawi, then choosing which opinion is the strongest. The data sources used are secondary data sources, namely Kitab Majmu' Fatawa by Imam Ibn Taimiyah and Kitab Raudhatul Thalibin by Imam an-Nawawi as well as books and articles based on OJS (Open Journal System). Data processing techniques are carried out by processing library materials (library research). Techniques in analyzing data analyzed by exploratory descriptive analysis using reduction, display, and verification techniques. The results of this study found that: First; The evidence used by Imam Malik is Qs. al-Baqarah: 178, Qs. al-Isra': 33, Qs. an-Nisa: 93, and Hadith was narrated by Imam Malik, Hadith was narrated by Abu Daud, and Hadith was narrated by al-Bukhari and Muslims. As for Imam al-Shafi'i using the arguments of Qs. al-Baqarah: 178 and Qs. al-Maidah: 45, Hadith narrated by Ibn Majah, Hadith narrated by Darul Quthni, and Hadith narrated by Ahmad. Second, the causes of the differences in opinion between the two Imams are in terms of their arguments and their understanding of and use of hadith. Third, after an in-depth analysis, the strong and relevant opinion applied in Indonesia is that of Imam al-Shafi'i

Keywords


: Imam al-Shafi'i; Imam Malik; Participation Murder

Full Text:

PDF

References


Absar, A. A. (2020). Restorative Justice in Islam with Special Reference to the Concept of Diyya. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 3(1), 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516606920927277

Aksoy, S. (2024). Kâdî Abdülcebbâr’ın Kur’ân Kıssalarına Yaklaşımı: Tenzîhü’l-Kur’ân ‘Ani’l-Metâ‘in Bağlamında Bir İnceleme. Mütefekkir, 11(21), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.30523/mutefekkir.1501162

Al-Syafi’i, M. I. bin. (1987). al-Umm. Dar al-Fikr.

Anas, M. bin. (1998). al-Muwatha’. Dar al-Fikr.

Az-Zuhaili, W. (2007). Fiqih Islam Wa Adillatuhu. Gema Insani.

Djalaluddin, M. M., Mas’ud, B., Sumardi, D., Bararah, I., & Kamus, K. (2023). The Implementation of Ta’zīr Punishment as an Educational Reinforcement in Islamic Law. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 399. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.15101

Dzajuli. (2000). Fiqih Jinayah. Rajawali Press.

Ibrahim, M. (2023). Fables (Qiṣaṣ) and Muslim Cultural Discourse in Nigeria. Islamic Africa, 14(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/21540993-20230012

Ilyas, N., & Fernanda, M. (2024). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK PELAKU TURUT SERTA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN. Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora, 2(9). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.572349/kultura.v2i9.2695

Khaeruman, B. (2024). Study of Criminal Hadiths and Qishash: Perspectives on Contemporary Islamic Legal Thought. Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis, 8(2), 351–374. https://doi.org/10.15575/diroyah.v8i2.34053

Luaha, Y. Z. (2024). PEMIDANAAN PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA YANG DILAKUKAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA. Jurnal Panah Hukum, 3(1).

Muhyidin, Adhi, Y. P., & Triyono. (2022). Contribution of Islamic Law Concerning The Death Penalty to the Renewal of Indonesian Criminal Law. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services, 4(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v4i1.55226

Rofiq, A., Pujiyono, & Arief, B. N. (2021). Eksistensi Tindak Pidana Ta’zir dalam Kehidupan Masyarakat Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review, 23(2), 241. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i2.4957

Sánchez, I. (2021). When the Beasts Lost Their Voice: Fables, Qiṣaṣ al-anbiyāʾ and Dramatic Irony in The Case of the Animals versus Man of the Ikhwān al-Ṣafāʾ. Journal of Abbasid Studies, 8(1), 38–74. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142371-12340065

Tusakdia, A., Hakim, L. N., & Zulfikar, E. (2024). The Relevance Of Hifdzun Nafs With The Law of Qishash: An Analysis Of Ibnu ’Ashur’s Interpretation In Tafsir al-Tahrir Wa al-Tanwir. Al-Shamela : Journal of Quranic and Hadith Studies, 2(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.61994/alshamela.v2i1.402


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Moefty : Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Flag Counter

Moefty Visitor

Creative Commons License

Moefty by Fakultas Syariah UIN Imam Bonjol Padang is licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)

EDITORIAL OFFICE

Fakultas Syariah UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Kampus III UIN Imam Bonjol Padang

Jl. Balai Gadang Kec. Koto Tangah, Kota Padang, Sumatera Barat 25171